Current:Home > StocksLatest attempt to chip away at ‘Obamacare’ questions preventive health care -Capitatum
Latest attempt to chip away at ‘Obamacare’ questions preventive health care
EchoSense Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-06 08:28:47
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A federal appeals court was scheduled to hear arguments Monday on whether former President Barack Obama’s signature health care law requires full insurance coverage of certain types of preventive care, including HIV prevention and some types of cancer screenings.
A federal judge in Texas said last year that it doesn’t. U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor in Fort Worth ruled that some of the preventive care requirements of the 2010 law are unconstitutional. If upheld, his ruling could affect coverage and costs for anywhere from 100 million to 150 million people, according to analyses by health care advocates.
The coverage mandates remain in effect for now. O’Connor’s ruling applied nationwide but it was put on hold pending the arguments at the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.
Not all preventive care was threatened by O’Connor’s ruling. An analysis by the nonprofit KFF foundation found that some screenings, including mammography and cervical cancer screening, would still be covered without out-of-pocket costs because the task force recommended them before the health care law was enacted in March 2010.
The Biden administration is appealing the ruling. Meanwhile, plaintiffs in the case have filed a cross-appeal that could broaden O’Connor’s ruling and endanger more preventive care mandates, according to the advocacy group , United States of Care.
The requirements for coverage are driven by recommendations by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which is made up of volunteers. O’Connor ruled that enforcing the recommendations was “unlawful” and a violation of the Constitution’s Appointment Clause, which lays out how government officials can be appointed.
Monday’s arguments mark the latest in more than a decade of conservative efforts to chip away at the Affordable Care Act, sometimes referred to as Obamacare. O’Connor is the judge who threw out the entire law in 2018, a decision later undone by the Supreme Court.
veryGood! (61)
Related
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- The Swift-Kelce romance sounds like a movie. But the NFL swears it wasn't scripted
- Special counsel finds Biden willfully disclosed classified documents, but no criminal charges warranted
- 2024 NBA trade deadline predictions: Sixers, Lakers make moves; Warriors stick it out
- 'Most Whopper
- Jellyfish with bright red cross found in remote deep-sea volcanic structure
- Lawmaker looks to make Nebraska the latest state to enact controversial ‘stand your ground’ law
- Elon Musk is synonymous with Tesla. Is that good or bad for shareholders?
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Food Network star Duff Goldman says hand injury is 'pretty bad' after car crash
Ranking
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- Former Nickelodeon Stars to Detail Alleged Abuse in Quiet on Set Docuseries
- Millions could place legal bets on the Super Bowl. Just not in California or Missouri
- Maryland Gov. Wes Moore outlines a data-driven plan to reach goals for the state
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- US has enough funds for now to continue training Ukrainian pilots on F-16, National Guard chief says
- Defense requests a mistrial in Jam Master Jay murder case; judge says no but blasts prosecutors
- Mark Ruffalo's Rare Outing With Lookalike Kids Proves They're Not 13 Anymore
Recommendation
Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
Jellyfish with bright red cross found in remote deep-sea volcanic structure
Near-total abortion ban rejected by Virginia House panel
A Nebraska bill would hire a hacker to probe the state’s computer, elections systems
Small twin
The Battle Over Abortion Rights In The 2024 Election
California's big cities are usually dry. Floods make a homelessness crisis even worse.
The FCC says AI voices in robocalls are illegal